Hi Jocelyn, I have a strong, passionate hatred for the Danvers Statement. We are to love God & hate evil. The Danvers Statement is evil.
Personally, I (like many) will have nothing to do with the Pauline church. I learned that it teaches and believes that women are the devil. I consider that evil.
My experiences in the Pauline church were so awful an experience of religious sexism, I determined to get to the root of the matter to cast out the devil: the accuser of women.
I found the root in Genesis 2-3. This creation and fall account is utterly satanic. The Genesis 2 creation account contradicts Genesis 1 in every way.
If superstition is going to grip Christian women, I believe we have failed in our endeavor to be worthy of our foremothers' heritage in their sacrifices and battles to secure for us property, voting, and human rights.
Genesis 2-3 is an obvious forgery added to the Bible by men who willed to enslave and tyrannize women.
I searched further. The Gospel of John corresponds perfectly to Genesis 1.
But all of Paul's writings disregard Genesis 1 and are founded entirely upon Genesis 2-3.
The Danvers Statement is founded solely upon Genesis 2-3 and the Pauline/Petrine epistles.
These writings are not consistent with born again Christian faith.
I will give 2 brief examples:
1. Woman in Genesis 2 is portrayed to be created as a soulless clone to whom neither man nor the faux creator spoke. She is not given right to speak in Genesis 2. She is stated to be a body the man owns as his own body as a chattel property slave: a fully dehumanized body thing sex object. That's not Christian. Genesis 2 is utterly pagan denying woman possibility of personal relationship with God and salvation. Woman is created as an object of prostitution as a sex slave void of power of consent or right of refusal relative sex and marriage.
2. 1 Corinthians 11:7a Man is stated to be the Image and Glory of God. [Capitalization of Image and Glory deemed contextually appropriate.] Paul denies the truth of Genesis 1 that male and female are equally created in God's image (as children of God equally born of God's Spirit). Instead, man is stated to be the same person as the faux creator in Genesis 2 in Image and Spirit: God Incarnate. Paul's conclusion is that the faux creator breathing into the man was a direct transfer of Incarnate Spirit making the man God and all men God by extension. This is Paul teaching exclusively male Christ Consciousness. It appears that Paul constitutes the embodiment of a merger of Aristotlean philosophy with man having sovereign deliberation and the story of the Hebrew Messiah being appropriated and paganized by Rome. His usage of Genesis 2-3 shows a Roman replacement religion of paganized faux Christianity built upon an appropriated Hebrew creation story rewritten as a Pandora myth.
We are witnessing, I believe, a pagan takeover of Protestant Christian faith by Roman pagan mythology.
This is not the Bible in a pure state. This is the Bible assaulted by the Hegelian Dialectic. Pagans added a Trojan Horse Antithesis Roman antichrist false gospel and false creation story.
Most of the modern New Testament appears written by Greco-Roman philosophers adding a false Roman replacement religion of male deification.
I assert that the Gospel of John, 2nd John, and Revelation appear the true early church letters.
It would appear that Rome has outsmarted the male led modern Protestant church through the sophistry and genius of Greco-Roman philosophers.
However, Rome has not outsmarted Protestant women systematic theologians and believers.
Women far excel male systematic theologians, male led universities, and male churches, I believe. John's writings appear clear that the Lord ordained women as congregational leaders of the church as well as its original lead apostles.
Hi Jocelyn, I have a strong, passionate hatred for the Danvers Statement. We are to love God & hate evil. The Danvers Statement is evil.
Personally, I (like many) will have nothing to do with the Pauline church. I learned that it teaches and believes that women are the devil. I consider that evil.
My experiences in the Pauline church were so awful an experience of religious sexism, I determined to get to the root of the matter to cast out the devil: the accuser of women.
I found the root in Genesis 2-3. This creation and fall account is utterly satanic. The Genesis 2 creation account contradicts Genesis 1 in every way.
If superstition is going to grip Christian women, I believe we have failed in our endeavor to be worthy of our foremothers' heritage in their sacrifices and battles to secure for us property, voting, and human rights.
Genesis 2-3 is an obvious forgery added to the Bible by men who willed to enslave and tyrannize women.
I searched further. The Gospel of John corresponds perfectly to Genesis 1.
But all of Paul's writings disregard Genesis 1 and are founded entirely upon Genesis 2-3.
The Danvers Statement is founded solely upon Genesis 2-3 and the Pauline/Petrine epistles.
These writings are not consistent with born again Christian faith.
I will give 2 brief examples:
1. Woman in Genesis 2 is portrayed to be created as a soulless clone to whom neither man nor the faux creator spoke. She is not given right to speak in Genesis 2. She is stated to be a body the man owns as his own body as a chattel property slave: a fully dehumanized body thing sex object. That's not Christian. Genesis 2 is utterly pagan denying woman possibility of personal relationship with God and salvation. Woman is created as an object of prostitution as a sex slave void of power of consent or right of refusal relative sex and marriage.
2. 1 Corinthians 11:7a Man is stated to be the Image and Glory of God. [Capitalization of Image and Glory deemed contextually appropriate.] Paul denies the truth of Genesis 1 that male and female are equally created in God's image (as children of God equally born of God's Spirit). Instead, man is stated to be the same person as the faux creator in Genesis 2 in Image and Spirit: God Incarnate. Paul's conclusion is that the faux creator breathing into the man was a direct transfer of Incarnate Spirit making the man God and all men God by extension. This is Paul teaching exclusively male Christ Consciousness. It appears that Paul constitutes the embodiment of a merger of Aristotlean philosophy with man having sovereign deliberation and the story of the Hebrew Messiah being appropriated and paganized by Rome. His usage of Genesis 2-3 shows a Roman replacement religion of paganized faux Christianity built upon an appropriated Hebrew creation story rewritten as a Pandora myth.
We are witnessing, I believe, a pagan takeover of Protestant Christian faith by Roman pagan mythology.
This is not the Bible in a pure state. This is the Bible assaulted by the Hegelian Dialectic. Pagans added a Trojan Horse Antithesis Roman antichrist false gospel and false creation story.
Most of the modern New Testament appears written by Greco-Roman philosophers adding a false Roman replacement religion of male deification.
I assert that the Gospel of John, 2nd John, and Revelation appear the true early church letters.
It would appear that Rome has outsmarted the male led modern Protestant church through the sophistry and genius of Greco-Roman philosophers.
However, Rome has not outsmarted Protestant women systematic theologians and believers.
Women far excel male systematic theologians, male led universities, and male churches, I believe. John's writings appear clear that the Lord ordained women as congregational leaders of the church as well as its original lead apostles.